As students, part of our engagement with our education is externally motivated — and reasonably so. Competitive admissions select for students who treat knowledge as capital, something to acquire and exchange for other goods: we pursue grades, summer programs, and extracurriculars to get into selective universities. Once we get to Harvard, these pressures return as the pressures to compete for post-grad opportunities. Many of us are also motivated, at least in part, by curiosity; the burning drive for understanding. Even among the more extrinsically motivated, cultivating curiosity is well worth the while. Curiosity has been shown to increase creativity, enhance memory, foster a sense of meaning in life, and promote engagement with one’s work. When coupled with effort, it even matches intelligence as a predictor of academic performance. Teach a man, and he learns for a day. Teach a man to love learning, and he learns for a lifetime. Suppose we make cultivating curiosity a primary goal of higher education. Then, even in fields one chooses primarily for employment — say, perhaps no longer, computer science — the task of the university is to bestow the love of learning computer science on the student. The development of specific skills and knowledge employed in computer science follows incidentally.
